||[Apr. 10th, 2007|11:23 am]
Listen in, listen Ian!
The news was annoying this morning wasn't it?|
First, there's the story about videos of pranks on teachers appearing on
YouTube. It's YouTube's fault, apparently. There was some mention of an
incident where a teacher's trousers were pulled down, and the video of it
was posted. Now, which do we think is the important thing we need to sort
out to improve the issue here? Is it the teacher being attacked and having
their trousers pulled down, or is it the YouTube part? The Secretary of
State for Education thinks it's the YouTube part. I think he's wrong.
Also, frozen embryo woman is back with yet another fvcking appeal.
Seriously, are they inventing new tiers of the court system for her to
appeal to? It's never-ending. Apparently the fact that her ex-partner can
unilaterally veto use of the embryi is symptomatic of a grave inequality,
which implies to me that if it was he who wanted to use an embryo, then she
could do nothing about it and it would be forcibly implanted if need be.
Now, IANAL but I don't think that's how it works. I think the rule is that
either partner can veto use, which sounds pretty fair and equal to me. She
needs to forget about all this baby nonsense - doesn't she know that the
Navy's crying out for childfree women who can be safely kidnapped by
hostile nations? Think what you can do for your country!